1969 Ford Thunderbird vs. 1962 Simca Plein Ceil
To start off, 1969 Ford Thunderbird is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Simca Plein Ceil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Simca Plein Ceil would be higher. In terms of performance, 1969 Ford Thunderbird (355 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 299 more horse power than 1962 Simca Plein Ceil. (56 HP @ 200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 1962 Simca Plein Ceil.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1969 Ford Thunderbird has automatic transmission and 1962 Simca Plein Ceil has manual transmission. 1962 Simca Plein Ceil will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1969 Ford Thunderbird will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Ford Thunderbird | 1962 Simca Plein Ceil | |
| Make | Ford | Simca |
| Model | Thunderbird | Plein Ceil |
| Year Released | 1969 | 1962 |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 355 HP | 56 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2360 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 91 L | 42 L |
