1969 Ford Thunderbird vs. 1963 Trabant Universal
To start off, 1969 Ford Thunderbird is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Trabant Universal. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Trabant Universal would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Ford Thunderbird (355 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 332 more horse power than 1963 Trabant Universal. (23 HP @ 3900 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 1963 Trabant Universal.
Because 1969 Ford Thunderbird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Ford Thunderbird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 Trabant Universal, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Ford Thunderbird (300 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 249 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Trabant Universal. (51 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 1969 Ford Thunderbird will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Trabant Universal.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Ford Thunderbird | 1963 Trabant Universal | |
| Make | Ford | Trabant |
| Model | Thunderbird | Universal |
| Year Released | 1969 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7029 cc | 595 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 355 HP | 23 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 3900 RPM |
| Torque | 300 Nm | 51 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2750 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2030 mm |
