1969 Ford Thunderbird vs. 1967 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1969 Ford Thunderbird is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Ford Thunderbird (355 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 138 more horse power than 1967 Ford Mustang. (217 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 1967 Ford Mustang.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Ford Thunderbird | 1967 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | Thunderbird | Mustang |
Year Released | 1969 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 4733 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 355 HP | 217 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 91 L | 68 L |