1969 Ford Thunderbird vs. 1971 Ford Falcon
To start off, 1971 Ford Falcon is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Ford Thunderbird (355 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 226 more horse power than 1971 Ford Falcon. (129 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 1971 Ford Falcon.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Ford Thunderbird (300 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 Ford Falcon. (259 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1969 Ford Thunderbird will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 Ford Falcon.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Ford Thunderbird | 1971 Ford Falcon | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | Thunderbird | Falcon |
Year Released | 1969 | 1971 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 3273 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 355 HP | 129 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 300 Nm | 259 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2830 mm |