1969 Ford Thunderbird vs. 1972 Mazda 616
To start off, 1972 Mazda 616 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Ford Thunderbird (355 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 276 more horse power than 1972 Mazda 616. (79 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 1972 Mazda 616.
Let's talk about torque, 1969 Ford Thunderbird (300 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 176 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mazda 616. (124 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1969 Ford Thunderbird will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mazda 616.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Ford Thunderbird | 1972 Mazda 616 | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | Thunderbird | 616 |
| Year Released | 1969 | 1972 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7029 cc | 1586 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 355 HP | 79 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 300 Nm | 124 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2480 mm |
