1969 Ford Thunderbird vs. 1997 Volvo S70
To start off, 1997 Volvo S70 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Ford Thunderbird (355 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 193 more horse power than 1997 Volvo S70. (162 HP @ 6100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 1997 Volvo S70.
Because 1969 Ford Thunderbird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Ford Thunderbird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Volvo S70, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Ford Thunderbird (300 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 79 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Volvo S70. (221 Nm @ 4700 RPM). This means 1969 Ford Thunderbird will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Volvo S70.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Ford Thunderbird | 1997 Volvo S70 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | Thunderbird | S70 |
Year Released | 1969 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 2435 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 355 HP | 162 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Torque | 300 Nm | 221 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2670 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 14.7 L/100km | 6.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 29.4 L/100km | 11.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 91 L | 68 L |