1969 Ford Thunderbird vs. 1999 Acura CL
To start off, 1999 Acura CL is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Ford Thunderbird (355 HP) has 155 more horse power than 1999 Acura CL. (200 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 1999 Acura CL.
Because 1969 Ford Thunderbird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Ford Thunderbird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Acura CL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Ford Thunderbird | 1999 Acura CL | |
Make | Ford | Acura |
Model | Thunderbird | CL |
Year Released | 1969 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 355 HP | 200 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2715 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 91 L | 65 L |