1969 Ford Thunderbird vs. 1999 Ford 021 C
To start off, 1999 Ford 021 C is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Ford Thunderbird (355 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 255 more horse power than 1999 Ford 021 C. (100 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 1999 Ford 021 C.
Because 1969 Ford Thunderbird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Ford Thunderbird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Ford 021 C, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Ford Thunderbird (300 Nm) has 154 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Ford 021 C. (146 Nm). This means 1969 Ford Thunderbird will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Ford 021 C.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Ford Thunderbird | 1999 Ford 021 C | |
| Make | Ford | Ford |
| Model | Thunderbird | 021 C |
| Year Released | 1969 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7029 cc | 1596 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 355 HP | 100 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 300 Nm | 146 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2490 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 91 L | 132 L |
