1969 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2002 Mazda AZ
To start off, 2002 Mazda AZ is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2002 Mazda AZ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Ford Thunderbird. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mazda AZ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Ford Thunderbird | 2002 Mazda AZ | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Thunderbird | AZ |
Year Released | 1969 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 657 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 355 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2370 mm |