1969 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2002 Mitsubishi SUP
To start off, 2002 Mitsubishi SUP is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Ford Thunderbird (355 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 192 more horse power than 2002 Mitsubishi SUP. (163 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 2002 Mitsubishi SUP.
Because 1969 Ford Thunderbird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Ford Thunderbird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mitsubishi SUP, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Ford Thunderbird (300 Nm) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Mitsubishi SUP. (240 Nm). This means 1969 Ford Thunderbird will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Mitsubishi SUP.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Ford Thunderbird | 2002 Mitsubishi SUP | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | Thunderbird | SUP |
Year Released | 1969 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 355 HP | 163 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 300 Nm | 240 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2620 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 91 L | 90 L |