1969 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2004 Nissan Murano
To start off, 2004 Nissan Murano is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Ford Thunderbird (355 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 110 more horse power than 2004 Nissan Murano. (245 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 2004 Nissan Murano.
Because 2004 Nissan Murano is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Ford Thunderbird. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Murano will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Murano (328 Nm) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Ford Thunderbird. (300 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Murano will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Ford Thunderbird.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Ford Thunderbird | 2004 Nissan Murano | |
| Make | Ford | Nissan |
| Model | Thunderbird | Murano |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7029 cc | 3507 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 355 HP | 245 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 300 Nm | 328 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 10.3:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2810 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 14.7 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 29.4 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 91 L | 82 L |
