1969 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2005 Subaru Outback
To start off, 2005 Subaru Outback is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Ford Thunderbird (355 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 105 more horse power than 2005 Subaru Outback. (250 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 2005 Subaru Outback.
Because 2005 Subaru Outback is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Ford Thunderbird. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Subaru Outback will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Ford Thunderbird (300 Nm) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Subaru Outback. (297 Nm). This means 1969 Ford Thunderbird will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Subaru Outback.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Ford Thunderbird | 2005 Subaru Outback | |
| Make | Ford | Subaru |
| Model | Thunderbird | Outback |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7029 cc | 2999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | boxer |
| Horse Power | 355 HP | 250 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 300 Nm | 297 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 10.7:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2530 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 14.7 L/100km | 9.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 29.4 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 91 L | 64 L |
