1969 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2009 Ford Explorer
To start off, 2009 Ford Explorer is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Ford Thunderbird (355 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 148 more horse power than 2009 Ford Explorer. (207 HP @ 5100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 2009 Ford Explorer.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Ford Thunderbird (300 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 46 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Ford Explorer. (254 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 1969 Ford Thunderbird will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Ford Explorer.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Ford Thunderbird | 2009 Ford Explorer | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | Thunderbird | Explorer |
Year Released | 1969 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 4009 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 355 HP | 207 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Torque | 300 Nm | 254 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3700 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 4.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 3320 mm |
Fuel Consumption City | 29.4 L/100km | 16.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 91 L | 85 L |