1969 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2012 Honda Accord
To start off, 2012 Honda Accord is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Ford Thunderbird (355 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 165 more horse power than 2012 Honda Accord. (190 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 2012 Honda Accord.
Because 1969 Ford Thunderbird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Ford Thunderbird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Honda Accord, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Ford Thunderbird (300 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 81 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Honda Accord. (219 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1969 Ford Thunderbird will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Honda Accord.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Ford Thunderbird | 2012 Honda Accord | |
Make | Ford | Honda |
Model | Thunderbird | Accord |
Year Released | 1969 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 355 HP | 190 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 300 Nm | 219 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 5-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2741 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 14.7 L/100km | 7.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 29.4 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 91 L | 70 L |