1969 Ford Zephyr vs. 2005 Renault Clio
To start off, 2005 Renault Clio is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Ford Zephyr. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Ford Zephyr would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 1969 Ford Zephyr is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Ford Zephyr (81 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 2005 Renault Clio. (73 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Ford Zephyr should accelerate faster than 2005 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Ford Zephyr weights approximately 85 kg more than 2005 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1969 Ford Zephyr is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Ford Zephyr. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Ford Zephyr (153 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 48 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Renault Clio. (105 Nm @ 1700 RPM). This means 1969 Ford Zephyr will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Ford Zephyr | 2005 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Ford | Renault |
| Model | Zephyr | Clio |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1995 cc | 1460 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 81 HP | 73 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 153 Nm | 105 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 1700 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 93.7 mm | 76 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 72.4 mm | 80.5 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 17.9:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1165 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 3990 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1500 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2930 mm | 2630 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 41 L | 55 L |
