1969 Holden Belmont vs. 1958 Triumph TR3
To start off, 1969 Holden Belmont is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Triumph TR3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Triumph TR3 would be higher. At 2,636 cc (6 cylinders), 1969 Holden Belmont is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Holden Belmont (112 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 1958 Triumph TR3. (94 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Holden Belmont should accelerate faster than 1958 Triumph TR3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Holden Belmont weights approximately 350 kg more than 1958 Triumph TR3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Holden Belmont | 1958 Triumph TR3 | |
Make | Holden | Triumph |
Model | Belmont | TR3 |
Year Released | 1969 | 1958 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2636 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 112 HP | 94 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1275 kg | 925 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 3840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1400 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1280 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2240 mm |