1969 Holden Belmont vs. 1986 Mazda RX-7
To start off, 1986 Mazda RX-7 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Holden Belmont. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Holden Belmont would be higher. At 3,034 cc (6 cylinders), 1969 Holden Belmont is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Mazda RX-7 (185 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 1969 Holden Belmont. (129 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Mazda RX-7 should accelerate faster than 1969 Holden Belmont.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Holden Belmont (247 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Mazda RX-7. (246 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1969 Holden Belmont will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Mazda RX-7.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Holden Belmont | 1986 Mazda RX-7 | |
Make | Holden | Mazda |
Model | Belmont | RX-7 |
Year Released | 1969 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3034 cc | 2354 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 129 HP | 185 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 247 Nm | 246 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1270 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2430 mm |