1969 Holden Belmont vs. 1996 Lada 110
To start off, 1996 Lada 110 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Holden Belmont. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Holden Belmont would be higher. At 3,034 cc (6 cylinders), 1969 Holden Belmont is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Holden Belmont (129 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 1996 Lada 110. (89 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Holden Belmont should accelerate faster than 1996 Lada 110.
Because 1969 Holden Belmont is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Holden Belmont. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Lada 110, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Holden Belmont (247 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 119 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Lada 110. (128 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 1969 Holden Belmont will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Lada 110.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Holden Belmont | 1996 Lada 110 | |
Make | Holden | Lada |
Model | Belmont | 110 |
Year Released | 1969 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3034 cc | 1498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 129 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 247 Nm | 128 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3700 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2500 mm |