1969 Holden Belmont vs. 1997 Renault Helem
To start off, 1997 Renault Helem is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Holden Belmont. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Holden Belmont would be higher. At 3,034 cc (6 cylinders), 1969 Holden Belmont is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Renault Helem (510 HP) has 381 more horse power than 1969 Holden Belmont. (129 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Renault Helem should accelerate faster than 1969 Holden Belmont. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Renault Helem weights approximately 375 kg more than 1969 Holden Belmont. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Holden Belmont (247 Nm) has 162 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Renault Helem. (85 Nm). This means 1969 Holden Belmont will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Renault Helem.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Holden Belmont | 1997 Renault Helem | |
Make | Holden | Renault |
Model | Belmont | Helem |
Year Released | 1969 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 3034 cc | 2975 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 129 HP | 510 HP |
Torque | 247 Nm | 85 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1275 kg | 1650 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2680 mm |