1969 Holden Belmont vs. 1998 Honda CR-V
To start off, 1998 Honda CR-V is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Holden Belmont. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Holden Belmont would be higher. At 3,034 cc (6 cylinders), 1969 Holden Belmont is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Holden Belmont (129 HP) has 1 more horse power than 1998 Honda CR-V. (128 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Holden Belmont should accelerate faster than 1998 Honda CR-V. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Honda CR-V weights approximately 225 kg more than 1969 Holden Belmont.
Because 1998 Honda CR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Holden Belmont. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Honda CR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Holden Belmont (247 Nm) has 67 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Honda CR-V. (180 Nm). This means 1969 Holden Belmont will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Honda CR-V.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Holden Belmont | 1998 Honda CR-V | |
Make | Holden | Honda |
Model | Belmont | CR-V |
Year Released | 1969 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3034 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 129 HP | 128 HP |
Torque | 247 Nm | 180 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1275 kg | 1500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2620 mm |