1969 Holden Belmont vs. 2000 Renault Clio
To start off, 2000 Renault Clio is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Holden Belmont. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Holden Belmont would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Holden Belmont weights approximately 340 kg more than 2000 Renault Clio.
Because 1969 Holden Belmont is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Holden Belmont. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Holden Belmont | 2000 Renault Clio | |
Make | Holden | Renault |
Model | Belmont | Clio |
Year Released | 1969 | 2000 |
Horse Power | 129 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1275 kg | 935 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2770 mm |