1969 Holden Belmont vs. 2000 Subaru Outback

To start off, 2000 Subaru Outback is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Holden Belmont. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Holden Belmont would be higher. At 3,034 cc (6 cylinders), 1969 Holden Belmont is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Subaru Outback (206 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 1969 Holden Belmont. (129 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Subaru Outback should accelerate faster than 1969 Holden Belmont. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Subaru Outback weights approximately 335 kg more than 1969 Holden Belmont. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2000 Subaru Outback is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Holden Belmont. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Subaru Outback will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Subaru Outback (282 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Holden Belmont. (247 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2000 Subaru Outback will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Holden Belmont.

Compare all specifications: