1969 Holden Belmont vs. 2002 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2002 Honda CR-V is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Holden Belmont. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Holden Belmont would be higher. At 5,025 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Holden Belmont is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Holden Belmont (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 2002 Honda CR-V. (160 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Holden Belmont should accelerate faster than 2002 Honda CR-V. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Honda CR-V weights approximately 123 kg more than 1969 Holden Belmont.
Because 2002 Honda CR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Holden Belmont. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Honda CR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Holden Belmont (410 Nm) has 192 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Honda CR-V. (218 Nm). This means 1969 Holden Belmont will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Honda CR-V.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Holden Belmont | 2002 Honda CR-V | |
| Make | Holden | Honda |
| Model | Belmont | CR-V |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5025 cc | 2359 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 160 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Torque | 410 Nm | 218 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1355 kg | 1478 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4540 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1690 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2630 mm |
