1969 Holden Belmont vs. 2002 Noble M12
To start off, 2002 Noble M12 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Holden Belmont. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Holden Belmont would be higher. At 2,968 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Noble M12 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Noble M12 (335 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 259 more horse power than 1969 Holden Belmont. (76 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Noble M12 should accelerate faster than 1969 Holden Belmont. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Holden Belmont weights approximately 150 kg more than 2002 Noble M12.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Noble M12 (485 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 322 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Holden Belmont. (163 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2002 Noble M12 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Holden Belmont.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Holden Belmont | 2002 Noble M12 | |
Make | Holden | Noble |
Model | Belmont | M12 |
Year Released | 1969 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2129 cc | 2968 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 76 HP | 335 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 163 Nm | 485 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1050 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4100 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1150 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2440 mm |