1969 Holden Belmont vs. 2002 Toyota Celica

To start off, 2002 Toyota Celica is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Holden Belmont. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Holden Belmont would be higher. At 3,034 cc (6 cylinders), 1969 Holden Belmont is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 129 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Holden Belmont weights approximately 135 kg more than 2002 Toyota Celica.

Because 1969 Holden Belmont is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Holden Belmont. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Toyota Celica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Holden Belmont (247 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 77 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Toyota Celica. (170 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 1969 Holden Belmont will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Toyota Celica.

Compare all specifications:

1969 Holden Belmont 2002 Toyota Celica
Make Holden Toyota
Model Belmont Celica
Year Released 1969 2002
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3034 cc 1832 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 129 HP 129 HP
Engine RPM 4400 RPM 6400 RPM
Torque 247 Nm 170 Nm
Torque RPM 2000 RPM 4200 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Vehicle Weight 1275 kg 1140 kg
Vehicle Length 4700 mm 4340 mm
Vehicle Width 1830 mm 1740 mm
Vehicle Height 1420 mm 1310 mm
Wheelbase Size 2830 mm 2800 mm