1969 Holden Belmont vs. 2005 Jeep Cherokee
To start off, 2005 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Holden Belmont. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Holden Belmont would be higher. At 3,034 cc (6 cylinders), 1969 Holden Belmont is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jeep Cherokee (147 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 1969 Holden Belmont. (129 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1969 Holden Belmont. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 559 kg more than 1969 Holden Belmont. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Jeep Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Holden Belmont. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jeep Cherokee (343 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 96 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Holden Belmont. (247 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2005 Jeep Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Holden Belmont.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Holden Belmont | 2005 Jeep Cherokee | |
Make | Holden | Jeep |
Model | Belmont | Cherokee |
Year Released | 1969 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3034 cc | 2497 cc |
Horse Power | 129 HP | 147 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 247 Nm | 343 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1275 kg | 1834 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2660 mm |