1969 Holden Belmont vs. 2005 Renault Scenic

To start off, 2005 Renault Scenic is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Holden Belmont. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Holden Belmont would be higher. At 3,034 cc (6 cylinders), 1969 Holden Belmont is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Renault Scenic (133 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1969 Holden Belmont. (129 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Renault Scenic should accelerate faster than 1969 Holden Belmont. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Renault Scenic weights approximately 495 kg more than 1969 Holden Belmont. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1969 Holden Belmont is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Holden Belmont. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Renault Scenic, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Holden Belmont (247 Nm) has 148 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Renault Scenic. (99 Nm). This means 1969 Holden Belmont will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Renault Scenic.

Compare all specifications: