1969 Holden Belmont vs. 2008 Mazda Etude
To start off, 2008 Mazda Etude is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Holden Belmont. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Holden Belmont would be higher. At 5,025 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Holden Belmont is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Holden Belmont weights approximately 262 kg more than 2008 Mazda Etude.
Because 1969 Holden Belmont is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Holden Belmont. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda Etude, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Holden Belmont (410 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 247 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda Etude. (163 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1969 Holden Belmont will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda Etude.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Holden Belmont | 2008 Mazda Etude | |
Make | Holden | Mazda |
Model | Belmont | Etude |
Year Released | 1969 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5025 cc | 1839 cc |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 410 Nm | 163 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1355 kg | 1093 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2620 mm |