1969 Holden Belmont vs. 2009 Holden UTE
To start off, 2009 Holden UTE is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Holden Belmont. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Holden Belmont would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden UTE (357 HP) has 228 more horse power than 1969 Holden Belmont. (129 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1969 Holden Belmont.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden UTE (530 Nm) has 283 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Holden Belmont. (247 Nm). This means 2009 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Holden Belmont.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Holden Belmont | 2009 Holden UTE | |
| Make | Holden | Holden |
| Model | Belmont | UTE |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3034 cc | 6000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 129 HP | 357 HP |
| Torque | 247 Nm | 530 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
