1969 Holden Belmont vs. 2010 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2010 Holden Cruze is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Holden Belmont. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Holden Belmont would be higher. At 3,034 cc (6 cylinders), 1969 Holden Belmont is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Cruze (139 HP) has 10 more horse power than 1969 Holden Belmont. (129 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Cruze should accelerate faster than 1969 Holden Belmont.
Because 1969 Holden Belmont is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Holden Belmont. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Holden Cruze, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Holden Belmont (247 Nm) has 71 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Holden Cruze. (176 Nm). This means 1969 Holden Belmont will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Holden Cruze.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Holden Belmont | 2010 Holden Cruze | |
Make | Holden | Holden |
Model | Belmont | Cruze |
Year Released | 1969 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3034 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 129 HP | 139 HP |
Torque | 247 Nm | 176 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4597 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1788 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1477 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2685 mm |