1969 Holden Belmont vs. 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Holden Belmont. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Holden Belmont would be higher. At 3,034 cc (6 cylinders), 1969 Holden Belmont is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee (187 HP) has 58 more horse power than 1969 Holden Belmont. (129 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1969 Holden Belmont.
Because 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Holden Belmont. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee (320 Nm) has 73 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Holden Belmont. (247 Nm). This means 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Holden Belmont.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Holden Belmont | 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | Holden | Jeep |
Model | Belmont | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 1969 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3034 cc | 2987 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 129 HP | 187 HP |
Torque | 247 Nm | 320 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4859 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1958 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1755 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2916 mm |