1969 Holden Belmont vs. 2012 Holden UTE
To start off, 2012 Holden UTE is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Holden Belmont. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Holden Belmont would be higher. At 5,025 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Holden Belmont is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden UTE (281 HP) has 73 more horse power than 1969 Holden Belmont. (208 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1969 Holden Belmont.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Holden Belmont (410 Nm) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Holden UTE. (350 Nm). This means 1969 Holden Belmont will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Holden UTE.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Holden Belmont | 2012 Holden UTE | |
Make | Holden | Holden |
Model | Belmont | UTE |
Year Released | 1969 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5025 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 281 HP |
Torque | 410 Nm | 350 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |