1969 Holden Belmont vs. 2012 Honda Civic
To start off, 2012 Honda Civic is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Holden Belmont. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Holden Belmont would be higher. At 3,034 cc (6 cylinders), 1969 Holden Belmont is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Honda Civic (138 HP) has 9 more horse power than 1969 Holden Belmont. (129 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Honda Civic should accelerate faster than 1969 Holden Belmont.
Because 1969 Holden Belmont is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Holden Belmont. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Honda Civic, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Holden Belmont (247 Nm) has 73 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Honda Civic. (174 Nm). This means 1969 Holden Belmont will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Honda Civic.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Holden Belmont | 2012 Honda Civic | |
Make | Holden | Honda |
Model | Belmont | Civic |
Year Released | 1969 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3034 cc | 1799 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 129 HP | 138 HP |
Torque | 247 Nm | 174 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1785 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1460 mm |