1969 Holden Monaro vs. 2002 Honda Acty

To start off, 2002 Honda Acty is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Holden Monaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Holden Monaro would be higher. At 3,032 cc (6 cylinders), 1969 Holden Monaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Holden Monaro (129 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 2002 Honda Acty. (127 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Holden Monaro should accelerate faster than 2002 Honda Acty. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Holden Monaro weights approximately 475 kg more than 2002 Honda Acty. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1969 Holden Monaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Holden Monaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Honda Acty, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Holden Monaro (246 Nm) has 107 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Honda Acty. (139 Nm). This means 1969 Holden Monaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Honda Acty.

Compare all specifications: