1969 Holden Monaro vs. 2006 Mazda 3
To start off, 2006 Mazda 3 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Holden Monaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Holden Monaro would be higher. At 5,733 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Holden Monaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Holden Monaro (296 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 157 more horse power than 2006 Mazda 3. (139 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Holden Monaro should accelerate faster than 2006 Mazda 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Holden Monaro weights approximately 361 kg more than 2006 Mazda 3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Holden Monaro (516 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 334 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda 3. (182 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1969 Holden Monaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda 3.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Holden Monaro | 2006 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Holden | Mazda |
Model | Monaro | 3 |
Year Released | 1969 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5733 cc | 1998 cc |
Horse Power | 296 HP | 139 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 516 Nm | 182 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1495 kg | 1134 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2650 mm |