1969 Holden Monaro vs. 2011 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2011 Honda CR-V is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Holden Monaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Holden Monaro would be higher. At 3,032 cc (6 cylinders), 1969 Holden Monaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Honda CR-V (148 HP) has 19 more horse power than 1969 Holden Monaro. (129 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Honda CR-V should accelerate faster than 1969 Holden Monaro.
Because 1969 Holden Monaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Holden Monaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Honda CR-V, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Honda CR-V (350 Nm) has 104 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Holden Monaro. (246 Nm). This means 2011 Honda CR-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Holden Monaro.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Holden Monaro | 2011 Honda CR-V | |
| Make | Holden | Honda |
| Model | Monaro | CR-V |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3032 cc | 2199 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 129 HP | 148 HP |
| Torque | 246 Nm | 350 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4554 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1819 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2619 mm |
