1969 Holden Monaro vs. 2012 Chevrolet Aveo
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Aveo is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Holden Monaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Holden Monaro would be higher. At 3,032 cc (6 cylinders), 1969 Holden Monaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Holden Monaro (129 HP) has 16 more horse power than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo. (113 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Holden Monaro should accelerate faster than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo.
Because 1969 Holden Monaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Holden Monaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Aveo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Holden Monaro (246 Nm) has 91 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo. (155 Nm). This means 1969 Holden Monaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Holden Monaro | 2012 Chevrolet Aveo | |
Make | Holden | Chevrolet |
Model | Monaro | Aveo |
Year Released | 1969 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3032 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 129 HP | 113 HP |
Torque | 246 Nm | 155 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4039 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1735 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1516 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2525 mm |