1969 Holden Monaro vs. 2012 Holden Calais

To start off, 2012 Holden Calais is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Holden Monaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Holden Monaro would be higher. At 5,733 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Holden Monaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Holden Monaro (296 HP) has 18 more horse power than 2012 Holden Calais. (278 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Holden Monaro should accelerate faster than 2012 Holden Calais.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Holden Monaro (516 Nm) has 166 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Holden Calais. (350 Nm). This means 1969 Holden Monaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Holden Calais.

Compare all specifications:

1969 Holden Monaro 2012 Holden Calais
Make Holden Holden
Model Monaro Calais
Year Released 1969 2012
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5733 cc 3600 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 296 HP 278 HP
Torque 516 Nm 350 Nm
Drive Type Rear Rear


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]