1969 Holden Monaro vs. 2012 Renault Clio
To start off, 2012 Renault Clio is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Holden Monaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Holden Monaro would be higher. At 2,638 cc (6 cylinders), 1969 Holden Monaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Holden Monaro (100 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 2012 Renault Clio. (60 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Holden Monaro should accelerate faster than 2012 Renault Clio.
Because 1969 Holden Monaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Holden Monaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Holden Monaro (213 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 119 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Renault Clio. (94 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1969 Holden Monaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Holden Monaro | 2012 Renault Clio | |
Make | Holden | Renault |
Model | Monaro | Clio |
Year Released | 1969 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2638 cc | 1149 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 213 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2480 mm |