1969 Isuzu Bellel vs. 2002 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2002 Volvo XC90 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Isuzu Bellel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Isuzu Bellel would be higher. At 2,519 cc (5 cylinders), 2002 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Volvo XC90 (197 HP) has 116 more horse power than 1969 Isuzu Bellel. (81 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Volvo XC90 should accelerate faster than 1969 Isuzu Bellel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 156 kg more than 1969 Isuzu Bellel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Volvo XC90 (320 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 158 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Isuzu Bellel. (162 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2002 Volvo XC90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Isuzu Bellel.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Isuzu Bellel | 2002 Volvo XC90 | |
| Make | Isuzu | Volvo |
| Model | Bellel | XC90 |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1991 cc | 2519 cc |
| Horse Power | 81 HP | 197 HP |
| Torque | 162 Nm | 320 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 1500 RPM |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1295 kg | 1451 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4800 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1900 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2860 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 72 L |
