1969 Isuzu Bellel vs. 2006 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Isuzu Bellel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Isuzu Bellel would be higher. At 2,597 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac CTS (179 HP) has 98 more horse power than 1969 Isuzu Bellel. (81 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1969 Isuzu Bellel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 499 kg more than 1969 Isuzu Bellel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac CTS (232 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Isuzu Bellel. (162 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2006 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Isuzu Bellel.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Isuzu Bellel | 2006 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Isuzu | Cadillac |
| Model | Bellel | CTS |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1991 cc | 2597 cc |
| Horse Power | 81 HP | 179 HP |
| Torque | 162 Nm | 232 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1295 kg | 1794 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4830 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2890 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 68 L |
