1969 Isuzu Bellel vs. 2012 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2012 Cadillac CTS is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Isuzu Bellel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Isuzu Bellel would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Cadillac CTS (270 HP) has 189 more horse power than 1969 Isuzu Bellel. (81 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1969 Isuzu Bellel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 453 kg more than 1969 Isuzu Bellel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Cadillac CTS (302 Nm @ 5700 RPM) has 140 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Isuzu Bellel. (162 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2012 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Isuzu Bellel.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Isuzu Bellel | 2012 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Isuzu | Cadillac |
Model | Bellel | CTS |
Year Released | 1969 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 3000 cc |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 270 HP |
Torque | 162 Nm | 302 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1295 kg | 1748 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4859 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1473 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 68 L |