1969 Isuzu Bellel vs. 2012 Mazda 3
To start off, 2012 Mazda 3 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Isuzu Bellel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Isuzu Bellel would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mazda 3 (167 HP) has 86 more horse power than 1969 Isuzu Bellel. (81 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1969 Isuzu Bellel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Mazda 3 weights approximately 88 kg more than 1969 Isuzu Bellel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Mazda 3 (228 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 66 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Isuzu Bellel. (162 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2012 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Isuzu Bellel.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Isuzu Bellel | 2012 Mazda 3 | |
| Make | Isuzu | Mazda |
| Model | Bellel | 3 |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1991 cc | 2500 cc |
| Horse Power | 81 HP | 167 HP |
| Torque | 162 Nm | 228 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1295 kg | 1383 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4506 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1755 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1471 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2639 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 60 L |
