1969 Jaguar 240 vs. 2000 Lotus Extreme
To start off, 2000 Lotus Extreme is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Jaguar 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Jaguar 240 would be higher. At 2,483 cc (6 cylinders), 1969 Jaguar 240 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Jaguar 240 (131 HP @ 5550 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 2000 Lotus Extreme. (120 HP @ 7800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Jaguar 240 should accelerate faster than 2000 Lotus Extreme. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Jaguar 240 weights approximately 984 kg more than 2000 Lotus Extreme. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Jaguar 240 (198 Nm) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Lotus Extreme. (180 Nm). This means 1969 Jaguar 240 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Lotus Extreme.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Jaguar 240 | 2000 Lotus Extreme | |
| Make | Jaguar | Lotus |
| Model | 240 | Extreme |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2483 cc | 700 cc |
| Horse Power | 131 HP | 120 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5550 RPM | 7800 RPM |
| Torque | 198 Nm | 180 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1440 kg | 456 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 3510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2420 mm |
