1969 Jaguar 240 vs. 2001 Saturn SC
To start off, 2001 Saturn SC is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Jaguar 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Jaguar 240 would be higher. At 2,483 cc (6 cylinders), 1969 Jaguar 240 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Jaguar 240 (131 HP @ 5550 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 2001 Saturn SC. (100 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Jaguar 240 should accelerate faster than 2001 Saturn SC. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Jaguar 240 weights approximately 370 kg more than 2001 Saturn SC. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1969 Jaguar 240 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Jaguar 240. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Saturn SC, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Jaguar 240 (198 Nm @ 3700 RPM) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Saturn SC. (155 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1969 Jaguar 240 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Saturn SC.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Jaguar 240 | 2001 Saturn SC | |
Make | Jaguar | Saturn |
Model | 240 | SC |
Year Released | 1969 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2483 cc | 1900 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 131 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 5550 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 198 Nm | 155 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76.5 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1440 kg | 1070 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 60 L |