1969 Jaguar 240 vs. 2003 Renault Clio
To start off, 2003 Renault Clio is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Jaguar 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Jaguar 240 would be higher. At 2,483 cc (6 cylinders), 1969 Jaguar 240 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Jaguar 240 (131 HP @ 5550 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 2003 Renault Clio. (97 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Jaguar 240 should accelerate faster than 2003 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Jaguar 240 weights approximately 440 kg more than 2003 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1969 Jaguar 240 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Jaguar 240. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Jaguar 240 (198 Nm @ 3700 RPM) has 71 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Renault Clio. (127 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 1969 Jaguar 240 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Jaguar 240 | 2003 Renault Clio | |
Make | Jaguar | Renault |
Model | 240 | Clio |
Year Released | 1969 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2483 cc | 1390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 131 HP | 97 HP |
Engine RPM | 5550 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 198 Nm | 127 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 79.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76.5 mm | 70 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1440 kg | 1000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 3820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2590 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.2 L/100km | 6.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 50 L |