1969 Jaguar 240 vs. 2004 Mercury Sable
To start off, 2004 Mercury Sable is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Jaguar 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Jaguar 240 would be higher. At 2,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mercury Sable is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mercury Sable (155 HP) has 24 more horse power than 1969 Jaguar 240. (131 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mercury Sable should accelerate faster than 1969 Jaguar 240. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mercury Sable weights approximately 73 kg more than 1969 Jaguar 240. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mercury Sable (251 Nm) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Jaguar 240. (198 Nm). This means 2004 Mercury Sable will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Jaguar 240.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Jaguar 240 | 2004 Mercury Sable | |
Make | Jaguar | Mercury |
Model | 240 | Sable |
Year Released | 1969 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2483 cc | 2983 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 131 HP | 155 HP |
Torque | 198 Nm | 251 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76.5 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.7:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1440 kg | 1513 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 5080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.2 L/100km | 10.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 68 L |