1969 Jaguar 240 vs. 2005 Volvo XC70
To start off, 2005 Volvo XC70 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Jaguar 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Jaguar 240 would be higher. At 2,524 cc (5 cylinders), 2005 Volvo XC70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Volvo XC70 (206 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 1969 Jaguar 240. (131 HP @ 5550 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Volvo XC70 should accelerate faster than 1969 Jaguar 240. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Jaguar 240 weights approximately 40 kg more than 2005 Volvo XC70.
Because 2005 Volvo XC70 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Jaguar 240. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Volvo XC70 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Volvo XC70 (320 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 122 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Jaguar 240. (198 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2005 Volvo XC70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Jaguar 240.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Jaguar 240 | 2005 Volvo XC70 | |
Make | Jaguar | Volvo |
Model | 240 | XC70 |
Year Released | 1969 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2483 cc | 2524 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 131 HP | 206 HP |
Engine RPM | 5550 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 198 Nm | 320 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1440 kg | 1400 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2570 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.2 L/100km | 10 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 70 L |