1969 Jaguar 240 vs. 2006 Mazda B2300
To start off, 2006 Mazda B2300 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Jaguar 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Jaguar 240 would be higher. At 2,483 cc (6 cylinders), 1969 Jaguar 240 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda B2300 (143 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1969 Jaguar 240. (131 HP @ 5550 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda B2300 should accelerate faster than 1969 Jaguar 240. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Jaguar 240 weights approximately 82 kg more than 2006 Mazda B2300.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda B2300 (209 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Jaguar 240. (198 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda B2300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Jaguar 240.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Jaguar 240 | 2006 Mazda B2300 | |
Make | Jaguar | Mazda |
Model | 240 | B2300 |
Year Released | 1969 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2483 cc | 2260 cc |
Horse Power | 131 HP | 143 HP |
Engine RPM | 5550 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 198 Nm | 209 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1440 kg | 1358 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2840 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.2 L/100km | 9.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 62 L |