1969 Jaguar 240 vs. 2006 Volvo S60
To start off, 2006 Volvo S60 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Jaguar 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Jaguar 240 would be higher. At 2,483 cc (6 cylinders), 1969 Jaguar 240 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Volvo S60 (161 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1969 Jaguar 240. (131 HP @ 5550 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Volvo S60 should accelerate faster than 1969 Jaguar 240. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Volvo S60 weights approximately 130 kg more than 1969 Jaguar 240. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1969 Jaguar 240 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Jaguar 240. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Volvo S60, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Volvo S60 (340 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 142 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Jaguar 240. (198 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2006 Volvo S60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Jaguar 240.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Jaguar 240 | 2006 Volvo S60 | |
Make | Jaguar | Volvo |
Model | 240 | S60 |
Year Released | 1969 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2483 cc | 2401 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 131 HP | 161 HP |
Engine RPM | 5550 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 198 Nm | 340 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 18.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1440 kg | 1570 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 4580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.2 L/100km | 6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 70 L |